Copyright conundrums — monkeying about with a camera
By Gary Assim
David Slater, a nature photographer from Gloucestershire, argues that he owns the copyright in a now-famous image taken using his camera — however, Wikipedia claims that there is no copyright in the image because it was actually taken by a monkey.
In 2011 Mr Slater followed a group of crested black macaques in Indonesia for three days, taking pictures as he went. It is unclear how it came about but one of the monkeys took a ‘selfie’ picture using Mr Slater’s camera and this picture ended up online and subsequently on Wikipedia.
Mr Slater claims that he owns the copyright in the image because the picture was taken on his camera. Wikipedia argues that because Mr Slater did not press the button he cannot own the rights in the image and therefore because monkeys are not legal persons the picture is in the public domain…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
In Cooke v MGN Ltd, the High Court gave the first judgment on the serious harm test in section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013.
The Competition and Markets Authority has published the final order in relation to the Competition Commission’s investigation into the UK statutory audit market for large companies.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…