Controversial break case update
Walker Morris reported recently on the High Court decision in Marks & Spencer v BNP Paribas Securities. The decision sparked controversy within the real-estate industry, particularly among commercial landlords, tenants and property litigators, because it seemed to fly in the face of established break notice principles and practice.
It has previously been clearly understood, and strictly endorsed by the courts, that post-break ‘overpayments’ (i.e, those rent and other lease payments that tenants are required to make in advance but that end up relating to periods following mid-term break dates) will only be recoverable from landlords where the particular lease in question contains express and very clear wording to that effect…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Intellectual property disputes involving retailers and fashion are all too common; another one to have troubled the courts in recent months is Thomas Pink v Victoria’s Secret UK.
In Biscuits Poult SAS v OHIM, the applicant for invalidity challenged the registration on the basis that the design in question was not new and lacked individual character.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.