Controversial break case update
Walker Morris reported recently on the High Court decision in Marks & Spencer v BNP Paribas Securities. The decision sparked controversy within the real-estate industry, particularly among commercial landlords, tenants and property litigators, because it seemed to fly in the face of established break notice principles and practice.
It has previously been clearly understood, and strictly endorsed by the courts, that post-break ‘overpayments’ (i.e, those rent and other lease payments that tenants are required to make in advance but that end up relating to periods following mid-term break dates) will only be recoverable from landlords where the particular lease in question contains express and very clear wording to that effect…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
An administrator, liquidator or receiver must make a ‘prescribed part’ of the company’s net property available for the satisfaction of unsecured debts.
If an individual borrower is made bankrupt or dies or if a corporate borrower goes into liquidation, any receiver appointed loses the agency relationship they would have previously had.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents