Contractual construction regarding identity — alleged misnomer
In Derek Hodd Ltd v Climate Change Capital Ltd  EWHC 1665 (Ch) the defendant disputed the identity of both parties to a contract.
While not technically a ‘misnomer’ case (which is where a party knows who it is to whom he wishes to refer but by mistake he attaches the wrong name to that person), neither party to the contract seemed to have directed its mind to the question of the identity of its counterparty. The court applied normal contractual rules of construction to identify the true parties to the contract.
The claimant, Derek Hood Ltd, claimed to have been assigned the benefit of a 2006 expense reduction consultancy agreement (the agreement) by Zukra Ltd, under which the claimant was entitled to certain fees from the defendant, Climate Change Capital Ltd (CCC). However, before Henderson J could resolve this fees claim, he had to consider the preliminary issue of CCC contesting the identities of both the parties to the agreement…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
At the time of its launch Accutrainee was described as a revolutionary change to the training model. Has it proved to be so? Not really.