Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Bill: implications for the construction industry
By Samuel Cho
The Legislative Council is currently debating the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Bill, and the bill may be passed as early as in the second half of this year. The main purpose of the proposed legislation is to reform the doctrine of privity by granting statutory rights to a person to acquire and enforce rights under a contract to which he is not a party. This article considers the potential impact of these statutory third-party rights on the construction industry.
The statutory third-party rights set out in the bill enable a third party to enforce a term of a contract to which he is not a party where the rights are expressly or impliedly conferred by the contract. For this to happen, the third party must be expressly identified in the contract by name, as a member of a class or as answering a particular description. It is possible for the contracting parties to opt out of the statutory regime by agreement.
The conferral of these third-party rights is effective even if the third party has not given consideration for the conferred rights. The conferral is also effective even if the third party was not in existence at the time the underlying contract was entered into. Statutory third-party rights may be assigned to another party in the same way that the contracting parties may assign their contractual rights unless the contract expressly prohibits it or the rights cannot be assigned due to it being personal to the third party…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Minter Ellison
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Minter Ellison
The Federal Court of Australia has dismissed the ACCC’s anti-competitive conduct case against Pfizer, finding that Pfizer did not breach the prohibition on misuse of market power.
Full Federal Court rules that partly ‘aspirational’ grievance policy was contractual and criticises company's investigation
This decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court is another sharp reminder to employers about the need to ensure their policies do not inadvertently become contractual.