Construction: project managers’ liability caps and the need to consider them carefully
The Technology and Construction Court case Ampleforth Abbey Trust v Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd  EWHC 2137 (TCC) highlights the need for project managers to consider caps on liability very carefully, for setting the level too low may well prevent them from relying on the limitation clause in their appointment.
Between 2000 and 2005, the trustees of Ampleforth Abbey Trust engaged Turner and Townsend Project Management (T&T) as project manager on three construction projects relating to the provision of new boarding accommodation for girls at Ampleforth College. This case relates to the third of those projects, on which Kier Regional was engaged as building contractor.
The trust was keen for construction to commence as soon as possible, but various outstanding issues prevented a construction agreement from being entered into before work began, and on the advice of T&T the trust entered into a letter of intent with Kier. For a variety of reasons, the construction agreement was not entered into prior to the works’ completion; instead, a new letter of intent was issued as the previous one expired and a total of eight letters had been entered into by the time the works were complete…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe