Construction (Design and Management) Regulations — update
By Mark Breslin
On 31 March 2014, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) launched a consultation document on proposed changes to the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 (the ‘CDM Regulations’), which included a copy of the draft Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2014.
Under the current proposals, the existing CDM Regulations would be scrapped and replaced with a different set of regulations. The aim is to simplify the CDM Regulations and include introduction of practical guidance to replace the approved code of practice and replacement of the CDM co-ordinator with a ‘principal designer’. The proposal also includes extending aspects of the CDM Regulations to apply to domestic clients.
The consultation will run until 6 June 2014 and the new regulations are proposed to come into force in April 2015…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem