Construction contracts: the risk of making yourself imperfectly clear
By Fraser Askham
You’ve decided to amend one of the standard forms of construction contract by striking through the relevant article in the agreement. But a recent judgment suggests that might not be good enough.
What happened? The contract in question was the JCT Intermediate Building Contract 2011. And the relevant amendment concerned adjudication. The employer hadn’t paid an interim payment so the contractor referred the matter to adjudication and won. The same thing happened a second time. But the employer still didn’t make either payment.
The contractor asked the court to enforce the adjudication decisions. The employer said that the decisions should not be enforced because there was no right to refer the disputes to adjudication. The employer pointed to the fact that the parties had agreed to delete the relevant article dealing with adjudication (article 7)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
The court considered the application of two clauses seeking to exclude and limit liability in the case of Polypearl Ltd v E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd.
Clauses that were a rarity three or four years ago are now increasingly being tabled in the negotiation phase of a building contract or consultant’s appointment.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem