Consent payments: are they lawful?
Are ‘payments’ offered to loan note holders to encourage their consent to documentation changes allowed?
In an interesting recent case, Sergio Azevedo v Imcopa Importacao, the validity of ‘consent payments’ offered to loan note holders to secure their votes in favour of certain amendments to the terms of the notes was considered, and the result may be surprising to some.
Imcopa had issued loan notes subject to the terms of a trust deed, which permitted the notes to be varied, provided that 75 per cent of the noteholders consented to the amendments. All amounts owing under the loan notes were to be paid on a pari passu — equal footing — basis…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
Careful drafting is usually required for restrictive covenants to be enforceable, although Prophet plc v Huggett provides the exception to the rule.
The Court of Appeal has overturned an earlier decision and ruled that the formal requirements of a break clause must be followed precisely in order to determine a lease.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…