Conflict minerals rule — limited portion invalidated; 2 June filing deadline looms
By Sanjay M Shirodkar and Douglas Rein
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has issued an opinion in the legal challenge to the conflict minerals rule adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in late 2012.
A divided court concluded that a portion of the statute and the SEC rule violate the First Amendment to the extent the statute and rule require issuers to report to the SEC and to state on their website that any of their products have ‘not been found to be DRC conflict free’.
While the petitioners had challenged the rule under the Administrative Procedures Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (including the failure of the SEC to adopt a de minimis exemption from reporting, criticism of the SEC’s cost-benefit analysis and alleged arbitrary actions by the SEC in adopting an extended phase-in period for smaller reporting companies), the court did not agree with those other challenges. The court remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
In the midst of the gale-force winds of commentary whipped up by the Google case, we should pause and ask ourselves: just how ground-breaking is this decision?
The shocking news of recent airline disasters brings into sharp focus for employers the sometimes unforeseeable risks facing employees who frequently travel for work.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions