Concurrent patent proceedings: to stay or not to stay?
The issue before the Court of Appeal in IPCom GmbH & Co Ltd v HTC Europe Ltd and others was the approach to be taken by national courts in patent proceedings where the validity of the same patent was also being considered at the European Patent Office.
EPO decisions take precedence over national decisions where the two conflict. National proceedings are often completed before EPO proceedings. Where this happens, and the EPO decision is at odds with the earlier national decision, the national decision is undermined — defeating the purpose of the proceedings. Logically, therefore, staying the national proceedings pending the EPO decision makes sense — save that EPO proceedings can be very long, and parties will often not have the luxury of time to play with…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
The FCA has published the above consultation paper, which sets out its intended approach to the implementation of a price cap for high-cost, short-term credit.
The DCLG has published revised criteria for deciding which local planning authorities are to be regarded as ‘poor performers’ in relation to their handling of planning applications.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents