Competition and restrictive covenants in leases
The Central London County Court has held that a user clause proposed in a lease renewal by a local authority landlord which would prohibit the tenant from selling convenience goods and alcohol would breach the prohibition in section 2 of the Competition Act 1998. The landlord failed to demonstrate that the user clause would be exempt from the prohibition.
The facts of this case should be viewed against the backdrop that the Act applied to property contracts from 6 April 2011 and therefore, pursuant to section 2 of the Act, property contracts cannot now:
- Affect trade within the UK; or
- Have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the UK.
The landlord owned and let a parade of shops within a residential area. Each lease restricted the user of the premises to encourage a variety of shops within the parade. On expiry of the lease before the court, the tenant proposed a change to the user covenant which included the ability for it (a newsagent) to sell convenience goods and alcohol. The landlord rejected this proposal and put forward a counter-proposal which included an express clause prohibiting such use…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
The US Treasury Department takes its ‘initial step in addressing inversions’ by issuing Notice 2014-52.
The government published its technical consultation on planning in July 2014; the consultation included proposals to increase permitted development rights for solar power.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive