Companions in disciplinary and grievance meetings: who chooses?
An employee attending a disciplinary or grievance meeting has a statutory right to be accompanied by a trade union official or a colleague. Statute sets out what the employee’s companion can or cannot do; and an employer who does not comply with the statutory companion duties can be ordered to pay up to two weeks’ pay (subject to the statutory cap on a week’s pay).
But what happens when the employer disagrees with the employee’s choice of companion (for example, because the employer believes that the companion will disturb the meeting, or that the companion is involved in the investigation, or that the employer has concerns about the companion’s approach to dispute resolution)?
A recent EAT decision (Toal v GB Oils) suggests that, as long as the companion falls within the statutory categories, the choice lies entirely with the employee. In doing so, the EAT expressly disagreed with the ACAS guidance on this issue. Subject to any appeal, the decision leaves employers with, effectively, two choices…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Nabarro
Briefings from Nabarro
The Safe Harbor scheme is of key importance to transatlantic trade.
Mr Mitchell’s solicitors have been denied the ability to recover costs, estimated to be in excess of £500,000, because they failed to file a costs budget on time.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Real estate continues to be the key money spinner for Nabarro, which has always been known for its work in the UK property market, (although) last year results were up across the firm. Google’s ...
A few UK200 firms – such as DWF – have managed to grow in the downturn. A few, such as Berwin Leighton Paisner, have come back stronger than ever after a wobble. Nabarro fits into neither category.