Companions in disciplinary and grievance meetings: who chooses?
An employee attending a disciplinary or grievance meeting has a statutory right to be accompanied by a trade union official or a colleague. Statute sets out what the employee’s companion can or cannot do; and an employer who does not comply with the statutory companion duties can be ordered to pay up to two weeks’ pay (subject to the statutory cap on a week’s pay).
But what happens when the employer disagrees with the employee’s choice of companion (for example, because the employer believes that the companion will disturb the meeting, or that the companion is involved in the investigation, or that the employer has concerns about the companion’s approach to dispute resolution)?
A recent EAT decision (Toal v GB Oils) suggests that, as long as the companion falls within the statutory categories, the choice lies entirely with the employee. In doing so, the EAT expressly disagreed with the ACAS guidance on this issue. Subject to any appeal, the decision leaves employers with, effectively, two choices…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
This case has highlighted the question of whether there is a ‘gap’ in clause 20 of the FIDIC conditions where arbitration is chosen as the final method of dispute resolution.
Lord Justice Jackson gave a keynote speech at the Costs Law and Practice Conference on 30 September, making a number of comments on the progress of his reforms.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem