Collision — claim forms — extension of time
The NIYAZI S collided with the STOLT KESTRAL near the port of Liverpool on 10 October 2010. Claimant owners of the STOLT KESTRAL issued an in rem claim form on 9 October 2012, just prior to expiry of the two-year time limit.
The NIYAZI S remained out of the jurisdiction and so on 10 December 2013 the claimant applied to add four sister-ship defendants to the in rem proceedings. On 11 December 2013, they also issued an in personam claim form.
Following various applications, the court was asked to determine the following issues…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe