Closing JR loophole: time limits for challenging procurement decisions
The government has brought in new rules to close the judicial review (JR) loophole. Until 30 June, a losing bidder in a public procurement process sometimes had two options to bring a challenge to a decision: a claim under the Public Contract Regulations 2006, which had to be brought within 30 days from when the claimant knew or ought to have known of the grounds for its claim; or JR, where the deadline was three months.
If the bidder missed the first deadline, it could try the second. Indeed, Virgin Rail last year famously issued two sets of proceedings, one under the regulations and the other under JR. In this way, it was able to benefit from the favourable JR limitation period and also the favourable regulation remedies such as the automatic suspension prohibiting contract signing.
While useful for the bidder, this created uncertainty for contracting authorities, which could not feel entirely secure entering into public contracts until the three-month judicial review limitation period had expired…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
Addleshaw Goddard has released its InVest publication for November 2013. This section focuses on banking.
The November 2013 edition of the Employee Incentives Alert has been published by Addleshaw Goddard.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.