Closing JR loophole: time limits for challenging procurement decisions
The government has brought in new rules to close the judicial review (JR) loophole. Until 30 June, a losing bidder in a public procurement process sometimes had two options to bring a challenge to a decision: a claim under the Public Contract Regulations 2006, which had to be brought within 30 days from when the claimant knew or ought to have known of the grounds for its claim; or JR, where the deadline was three months.
If the bidder missed the first deadline, it could try the second. Indeed, Virgin Rail last year famously issued two sets of proceedings, one under the regulations and the other under JR. In this way, it was able to benefit from the favourable JR limitation period and also the favourable regulation remedies such as the automatic suspension prohibiting contract signing.
While useful for the bidder, this created uncertainty for contracting authorities, which could not feel entirely secure entering into public contracts until the three-month judicial review limitation period had expired…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
Also: cultural differences could wreck the single EU data protection law dream; data protection authorities face resource challenges due to digital boom; and more.
The ECJ has confirmed that ‘establishment’ means the local employment unit to which the redundant worker is assigned.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?