Clinical negligence claims — robustly rejecting rogues
By Flora McCabe
A successful claim in a clinical negligence case will require the claimant to prove the key issues of:
- Duty (of the clinician or other health professional or organisation)
- Breach of that duty
- Damage suffered
- Causation (i.e. did the alleged breach of duty cause the damage, or loss, complained of?)
Claimants are also required to adduce evidence in order to convince the court that, on the balance of probabilities, the defendant in question is liable.
It can often be the case that, in defending such claims, we find the evidence is incomplete or absent. It therefore becomes imperative that we, as defence solicitors, identify the opportunities that attend the case to take a robust stance in order to protect the defence position…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why