Clarity Guide 8: trustee protection — exoneration and indemnity clauses
Mistakes can happen, and individual and corporate trustees can be held liable for a breach of trust, whether it was deliberate, negligent or innocent. This guide from Nabarro explains the differences between exoneration and indemnity clauses in a scheme’s trust deed and rules.
Exoneration clauses (also known as exemption clauses) operate so that a trustee is not liable to the scheme’s beneficiaries for any breach of trust (unless there has been actual fraud or dishonesty). They can cover a wide range of conduct, including: “negligence”; “gross negligence”, innocent breaches and “wilful default”. The precise wording of an exoneration clause, and so the scope of trustee protection, will vary from scheme to scheme (if included at all).
The Courts have (repeatedly) held that exoneration clauses cannot exempt trustees from liability arising because of “actual fraud” or dishonesty…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem