Clarity Guide 8: trustee protection — exoneration and indemnity clauses
Mistakes can happen, and individual and corporate trustees can be held liable for a breach of trust, whether it was deliberate, negligent or innocent. This guide from Nabarro explains the differences between exoneration and indemnity clauses in a scheme’s trust deed and rules.
Exoneration clauses (also known as exemption clauses) operate so that a trustee is not liable to the scheme’s beneficiaries for any breach of trust (unless there has been actual fraud or dishonesty). They can cover a wide range of conduct, including: “negligence”; “gross negligence”, innocent breaches and “wilful default”. The precise wording of an exoneration clause, and so the scope of trustee protection, will vary from scheme to scheme (if included at all).
The Courts have (repeatedly) held that exoneration clauses cannot exempt trustees from liability arising because of “actual fraud” or dishonesty…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Nabarro
Briefings from Nabarro
Mr Mitchell’s solicitors have been denied the ability to recover costs, estimated to be in excess of £500,000, because they failed to file a costs budget on time.
Nabarro has released the October 2013 issue of its Pensions Update, which discusses money purchase benefits among other topics.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Real estate continues to be the key money spinner for Nabarro, which has always been known for its work in the UK property market, (although) last year results were up across the firm. Google’s ...
A few UK200 firms – such as DWF – have managed to grow in the downturn. A few, such as Berwin Leighton Paisner, have come back stronger than ever after a wobble. Nabarro fits into neither category.