Clarity Guide 8: trustee protection — exoneration and indemnity clauses
Mistakes can happen, and individual and corporate trustees can be held liable for a breach of trust, whether it was deliberate, negligent or innocent. This guide from Nabarro explains the differences between exoneration and indemnity clauses in a scheme’s trust deed and rules.
Exoneration clauses (also known as exemption clauses) operate so that a trustee is not liable to the scheme’s beneficiaries for any breach of trust (unless there has been actual fraud or dishonesty). They can cover a wide range of conduct, including: “negligence”; “gross negligence”, innocent breaches and “wilful default”. The precise wording of an exoneration clause, and so the scope of trustee protection, will vary from scheme to scheme (if included at all).
The Courts have (repeatedly) held that exoneration clauses cannot exempt trustees from liability arising because of “actual fraud” or dishonesty…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Nabarro
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Nabarro
Clauses that were a rarity three or four years ago are now increasingly being tabled in the negotiation phase of a building contract or consultant’s appointment.
Estoppel and waiver are closely linked legal principles that are both fundamentally concerned with fairness.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem