Clamping down on unlawful subletting
By Bukola Aremu
The Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 (the Act) came into force on 15 October 2013. The Act aims to address the overwhelming statistics relating to unlawful subletting and housing fraud.
The Act introduces unlawful profit orders and the permanent loss of security of tenure for assured tenants who unlawfully sublet their property.
The UPO is available in both civil and criminal proceedings. The court can order that the tenant pay to the landlord the profit made from the unlawful subletting if it finds the tenant has breached the tenancy in the following ways…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The Court of Appeal has found in favour of a business tenant and decided that a periodic tenancy had not been created in the intervening period.
Careful drafting is usually required for restrictive covenants to be enforceable, although Prophet plc v Huggett provides the exception to the rule.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…