Claim for cease and desist against sending unrequested ‘tell a friend’ recommendation emails via a recommendation function
Based on its judgment of 12 September 2013, the Federal Supreme Court has found that a claim for cease and desist can be asserted against the company that provides a so-called recommendation function at its webpage if recommendation emails are being sent via such a function without the addressee’s consent and if the company appears as the email sender.
A recommendation function is a function set up on a company’s website via which third parties can enter their own email addresses as well as additional email addresses (e.g. of relatives, friends and acquaintances).
The internet page then sends an automatically generated email to this additional email address; said email refers to the webpage of the company that can be accessed there. In this particular case, the defendant (i.e. the company that provided the recommendation function at its webpage) appeared as the sender when the email was received by the claimant. The recommendation emails do not contain any further content. The first two instances had dismissed the action…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
The case of FOA (Kaltoft) v Billund (C-354/13) is the first time the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has considered issues concerning obesity-based discrimination. More specifically, it has looked at whether obesity can be classed as a ‘disability’ under the Equal Treatment Directive.
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s dedicated insolvency litigation team brings you its monthly update on the issues affecting the insolvency and fraud investigation industry.