Chinese Utility Models and prior art

The Court of Appeal has upheld a decision of HHJ Birss QC in the Patents County Court (now the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court) finding that the appellant’s patent for a baby buggy module was invalid for obviousness.

The respondent, Phil & Ted’s Most Excellent Buggy Company, argued that the prior art — the ‘Goodbaby’ — was such that if a skilled person were to put the disclosure into practice, without any inventive step, the resulting product would fall within the ambit of the claim of the patent in suit. The patent in suit was a buggy module, convertible between seat and cot configurations; the Goodbaby was also convertible between seat and cot configurations, so the Court of Appeal had no difficulty in concluding that a skilled person would have treated the Goodbaby as an appropriate starting point for the invention…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from Walker Morris

View more briefings from Walker Morris

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


Kings Court
12 King Street

Turnover (£m): 42.50
No. of lawyers: 188