Chinese shipyard resists multi-million-dollar claim in London arbitration proceedings

The English Commercial Court’s recent decision in Primera Maritime (Hellas) Ltd and Others v Jiangsu Eastern Heavy Industry Co Ltd and Another confirmed that matters of fact and evaluation of evidence are for the arbitrators, and it is precisely such situations where the court ought not to intervene.

In an application under section 68(2)(d) of the Arbitration Act 1996 to challenge an award for serious irregularity, on the basis the tribunal failed to deal with certain issues put to it by the parties, the court confirmed that an applicant should not subject each sentence of the tribunal’s reasoning to a minute textual analysis with a view to demonstrating that the tribunal has failed to deal with a particular issue. That is the wrong approach. The losing party to an arbitration should not nit-pick and look for inconsistencies and faults in the award.

The court held in the present case that the tribunal’s reasons were perfectly reasonable and explicable. However, even if they were not and the tribunal’s conclusion could be said to be surprising, unusual or even wrong, it was a conclusion of fact that is not susceptible to review by the court, whether under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 or otherwise…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from DLA Piper

View more briefings from DLA Piper

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


3 Noble Street

Turnover (£m): 1,566.29
No. of lawyers: 3,961 (UK 200)
Jurisdiction: global
No. of offices: more than 75
No. of qualified lawyers: 542 (International 50)
No. of partners: 142.6