Changes to whistleblowing law: in the public interest?
By Alan Chalmers
Recent news stories concerning the NHS and the financial services industry have highlighted how challenging the issues associated with whistleblowing can be for an organisation. On the one hand, employers need to know if there are illegal, improper or dangerous practices going on, in order to manage risk and avoid litigation or even criminal liability. On the other hand, the disclosure of information about wrongdoing within an organisation to the public in general may hinder internal investigation, damage the reputation of the organisation and affect staff morale.
The law seeks to achieve a balance between these competing interests by providing protection for whistleblowers but only in limited circumstances. Under the current public interest disclosure legislation, it is unlawful for an employer to subject one of its workers to a detriment or to dismiss an employee on the ground that they have made a ‘protected disclosure’. This means a disclosure that, in the reasonable belief of the worker, tends to show a criminal offence, breach of any legal obligation, miscarriage of justice, danger to health and safety of any individual, damage to the environment or a deliberate cover-up of any of these.
Whistleblowing claims can be attractive to employees as they are not subject to any length of service criteria, there is no cap on compensation and there is also potential for negative publicity to put pressure on employers to agree a settlement. As a result, the law has increasingly been used in circumstances that were not foreseen when the legislation came into force. For example, claims have been brought by employees seeking to rely on disclosures of alleged breaches of their own employment contracts…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
In the midst of the gale-force winds of commentary whipped up by the Google case, we should pause and ask ourselves: just how ground-breaking is this decision?
The shocking news of recent airline disasters brings into sharp focus for employers the sometimes unforeseeable risks facing employees who frequently travel for work.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions