Changes to prospectus filing requirements for listed Bermuda companies
As a result of recent statutory amendments, Bermuda companies listed on appointed stock exchanges are no longer required to file prospectuses in Bermuda.
Prior to the Companies Amendment Act 2013, a Bermuda company listed on an appointed stock exchange — which includes most of the world’s major stock exchanges — was required to file in Bermuda a copy of any prospectus that had to be filed under the rules of that stock exchange (or pursuant to the rules of the relevant regulator). As a result of the amendments, the requirement to also file in Bermuda has been abolished.
In addition, where the rules of the stock exchange (or of the relevant regulator) do not require publication and filing of a prospectus, there is no requirement to file in Bermuda either…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Conyers Dill & Pearman briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Conyers Dill & Pearman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Conyers Dill & Pearman
Effective 1 December 2015, the British Virgin Islands Registry of Corporate Affairs will be offering premium services.
The Supreme Court has now “clarified”, in reality re-formulated, the applicable test for determining whether a particular contractual provision should be struck down as being a penalty.