Challenge to fees charged by lenders in the Czech Republic
Over the last few months, the lawfulness of certain fees charged by Czech retail lenders to their borrowers has been challenged. Tens of thousands of customers have reportedly claimed that fees they paid should be refunded. Several first-instance decisions have been issued that ruled that fees were charged unlawfully and should be refunded. These decisions may have implications for the way banks charge fees, not only in the retail sector but more widely.
A German Federal Court of Justice decision in 2011 found that it was unlawful under German law for a bank to charge its consumer customers a fee for maintaining an account evidencing the disbursements and repayments of a loan. The German court found, in essence, that the maintaining of the loan account was entirely in the bank’s interest and that an obligation to pay the fee constituted an unfair term under provisions of the German Civil Code implementing Council Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts. The directive has also been implemented into Czech law.
Similar types of fee are usually referred to as a ‘loan account fee’ or a ‘loan maintenance fee’ in the Czech Republic and normally amount to an equivalent of a few euros payable monthly. The German decision was published in the Czech legal press in 2012 and was quickly publicised by consumer-protection activists. Several law firms offered to represent customers against banks on a contingency-fee basis, claiming the refund of such loan account fees paid over the past four years, which is the applicable limitation period. They are reported to have attracted tens of thousands of claimants, which makes the potential liability on the part of the banks significant even if the amount of the average individual claim is not…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
Money purchase deconstructed: working with the new definition — a checklist for trustees and administrators
The definition of money purchase benefits is changing, as are the rules on how schemes are required to deal with any benefit that becomes classified as a ‘non-money purchase’.
Despite the progress that has been made towards launching the European unitary patent system and the Unified Patent Court, Spain continues to actively oppose the changes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
At the time of its launch Accutrainee was described as a revolutionary change to the training model. Has it proved to be so? Not really.
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.