Caymans: Master fund registration update
The regulatory regime in the Cayman Islands requires certain open-ended investment funds to register with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) as regulated mutual funds. 2012 saw the registration, for the first time, of certain Cayman Islands master funds in open-ended Cayman Islands fund structures as a result of changes introduced by the Mutual Funds (Amendment) Law, 2011. Practitioners in Cayman generally took the view that master funds which only had a single feeder fund which was a CIMA regulated fund were not required to register.
The Mutual Funds (Amendment) Law, 2012 came into effect on 10 January 2013 and, by amending the definitions of “feeder fund”, “master fund” and “regulated feeder fund”, has clarified which “master” entities are required to register with CIMA as mutual funds…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
The Cayman Islands’ Grand Court (Amendment) Law 2014 introduces the legislative clarification of the law providing for interim relief in aid of foreign proceedings.
The Court of Appeal has considered whether an employee who was unwilling to work out his notice period could treat the contract as at an end and work for a competitor.