Caught between a rock and a hard place — cross-border document requests in litigation
Access to documents in cross-border litigation can play a decisive role in the outcome of a dispute. Common law courts worldwide order the disclosure or discovery of all relevant documents (whether helpful or harmful).
However, some jurisdictions have legislation that restricts the provision of documents in support of foreign litigation. Where a court from one jurisdiction requests documents that are situated in a jurisdiction in which these restrictions apply, conflicting legal duties arise. The litigant may be caught between a rock and a hard place. By providing the documents, it may risk criminal prosecution in its home jurisdiction; if it does not, it risks being held in contempt of court in the jurisdiction where the dispute is being heard. Allen & Overy explores some recent cases highlighting these tensions…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
Money purchase deconstructed: working with the new definition — a checklist for trustees and administrators
The definition of money purchase benefits is changing, as are the rules on how schemes are required to deal with any benefit that becomes classified as a ‘non-money purchase’.
Despite the progress that has been made towards launching the European unitary patent system and the Unified Patent Court, Spain continues to actively oppose the changes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
At the time of its launch Accutrainee was described as a revolutionary change to the training model. Has it proved to be so? Not really.
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.