Case update: a timely reminder — delay in bringing security for costs applications may be fatal
By Matthew Carr
In the recent decision of Trility Pty Ltd v Ancon Drilling Pty Ltd  VSC 577, the Supreme Court of Victoria reaffirmed the position that any delay in bringing a security for costs application is a factor that bears considerable weight in the exercise of the court’s discretion to grant such an order. This is particularly so where the applicant knew, for some time, of the other party’s potential inability to satisfy an adverse costs order in the main proceedings and simply kept the application ‘up their sleeve to play at their convenience’.
In this case, the applicant was found to have known of the other party’s potential inability for a period of 17 months before bringing the application. The application was brought one month out from the commencement of arbitral proceedings…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
Principals and contractors need to be aware that in not registering security interests under the PPSA 2009, they may risk serious consequences.
The New Companies Ordinance (NCO) will come into effect on 3 March 2014. It includes changes that affect the way documents may be executed.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Hong Kong IPO activity is hotting up again, but UK legal stalwarts are looking over their shoulders as US rivals make up ground fast
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out