Case law update: Pitt v HMRC and Futter v HMRC
On 9 May 2013, the Supreme Court published its judgment in the combined cases of Futter and another v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and Pitt and another v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Respondent) (Pitt v HMRC and Futter v HMRC). The case is significant for trustees and advisers (and their insurers) because it confirms the limits of the Hastings-Bass rule, as set out in the judgment of Lloyd J in the Court of Appeal, which had been used for many years by trustees to set aside decisions that had brought about unplanned tax charges.
A link to our article on the Court of Appeal judgment in the July 2011 edition of Pensions Pieces is set out below. That article includes a description of the Hastings-Bass rule, as stated by Lloyd J (as he then was) in Sieff v Fox…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
Cross-border investment and M&A between China and Europe in the clean energy sector was quiet in 2013.
On 12 December, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered three important rulings on supplementary protection certificates under Regulation 469/2009/EC.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town