Can't pay, must pay — Employment Tribunal's costs award against claimant upheld
The claimant brought various discrimination, harassment and whistleblowing claims against the council, a previous employer from whom she had TUPE transferred and also against a number of individual colleagues. All the respondents had common representation. Following a 20-day hearing, all the claims were dismissed by the Employment Tribunal and the claimant was ordered to pay costs of one third of the respondents’ total costs (£260,000, to be assessed), on the basis that the claim was misconceived from the start.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decided that the costs award, which they took to be £60,000 after assessment, had been correctly made, even though the respondents had not applied for a deposit order and there had been no costs warnings…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
Judgments handed down from the People’s Court all over the country will be available online from 1 January 2014, as part of the initiative by the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) to increase judicial transparency.
An issue that comes up fairly regularly in redundancy selection is whether employers must consider all employees in similar roles or whether they can opt for a ‘pool of one’.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies
The Russian legal market faces a new era as the government opens the door to greater business transparency, but not everything is open to scrutiny