Can't pay, must pay — Employment Tribunal's costs award against claimant upheld
The claimant brought various discrimination, harassment and whistleblowing claims against the council, a previous employer from whom she had TUPE transferred and also against a number of individual colleagues. All the respondents had common representation. Following a 20-day hearing, all the claims were dismissed by the Employment Tribunal and the claimant was ordered to pay costs of one third of the respondents’ total costs (£260,000, to be assessed), on the basis that the claim was misconceived from the start.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decided that the costs award, which they took to be £60,000 after assessment, had been correctly made, even though the respondents had not applied for a deposit order and there had been no costs warnings…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The new Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622), which came into effect on 3 March 2014, is a substantial rewrite of Hong Kong companies law.
Employment News — 14 April 2014: the final straw — employer entitled to take strict view in light of previous warnings
Before his dismissal, the claimant in Disotto Food Ltd v Carlos Santos for misconduct he had been given three warnings about his conduct.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump
When a firm shouts loudly about a landmark merger, as SJ Berwin did when it joined forces with King & Wood Mallesons, departures are always likely to come under the spotlight.