Can't pay, must pay — Employment Tribunal's costs award against claimant upheld
The claimant brought various discrimination, harassment and whistleblowing claims against the council, a previous employer from whom she had TUPE transferred and also against a number of individual colleagues. All the respondents had common representation. Following a 20-day hearing, all the claims were dismissed by the Employment Tribunal and the claimant was ordered to pay costs of one third of the respondents’ total costs (£260,000, to be assessed), on the basis that the claim was misconceived from the start.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decided that the costs award, which they took to be £60,000 after assessment, had been correctly made, even though the respondents had not applied for a deposit order and there had been no costs warnings…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump