Candid camera — employer's filming of employee was not a human rights breach
The employer in City and County of Swansea v Gayle was informed that an employee had been seen playing squash at a sports centre on two occasions when he was paid for being at work. The employer secretly filmed the claimant, which confirmed this and he was dismissed.
His claim for unfair dismissal in the tribunal was successful on the basis that Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to respect for private life) had been breached by the use of the covert surveillance.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) allowed the appeal, noting that individuals in public places do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy and that an employer is entitled to know where someone is and what they are doing in the employer’s time…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump