Can you be dismissed for actions outside of the workplace?
The case of CJD v Royal Bank of Scotland considered whether the dismissal of an employee accused of assaulting his partner (who was also his colleague) outside of work constituted either unfair dismissal or sex discrimination.
Legally, dismissal will be unfair unless the employer can show it dismissed the employee for a potentially fair reason and acted reasonably in treating this reason as a sufficient reason for dismissal. There will be a valid sex discrimination claim if an employee can prove that the employer treats him or her less favourably than another employee due to their sex.
In this case, the employee (CJD) was in a relationship with a fellow employee (LC). One evening, at home, they had an argument involving physical contact. They both raised their voices and CJD kicked the door. CJD was arrested and charged with assault. LC was not arrested. CJD said that he was acting in self defence, which the court accepted…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
In Southern v Britannia Hotels Ltd, an employment tribunal granted a significant award of £19,500 to a zero-hours worker who was subjected to harassment by her line manager.
In Williams and Leeds United Football Club the High Court considered whether the claimant was entitled to be paid 12 months’ notice pay, despite having been found by his employer to have sent pornographic images to three individuals five years earlier.