Can hindsight be used when assessing losses in a breach of warranty claim?
By Jonathan Grigg
In Ageas (UK) Ltd v (1) Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd (2) AIG Europe Ltd , where Shoosmiths acted for the claimant, the High Court examined principles relevant to the permissibility of using hindsight to value a company for the purposes of a warranty claim.
The case concerned a breach of warranty claim in relation to a share purchase agreement. Ageas entered into the agreement to purchase the full share capital of Kwik-Fit Insurance Services for £215m. Ageas valued the company on the basis of the accounts provided by Kwik-Fit.
Kwik-Fit gave warranties that the audited accounts were prepared in accordance with GAAP, and gave a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the company and its subsidiaries, and that it did not materially misstate the assets or liabilities. At the same time as entering into the agreement, Ageas entered into a warranty and indemnity policy with AIG to protect it against losses resulting from breaches of warranty in excess of a £5m cap…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
A developer can commit the offence of ‘knowingly permitting’ the deposit of waste by its contractor, despite having no knowledge that the deposit was in breach of an environmental permit.
The case of Hershaw and ors v Sheffield City Council is a reminder to employers to be careful about how and what they communicate to their employees.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…