Can employers increase a disciplinary sanction on appeal?
By Jacqueline McCluskey
It is perhaps not an uncommon belief, among managers conducting disciplinary appeal hearings, that they are entitled to look at all matters afresh and reach their own conclusions. Indeed that is often instilled in them by HR teams, keen to emphasise that an appeal hearing is not a tick-box exercise but rather a thorough review of the facts and the procedures followed to date.
A recent decision handed down from the Court of Appeal (McMillan v Airedale NHS Trust) has, however, confirmed that in some cases the extent of the appeal manager’s authority does not include increasing the disciplinary sanction imposed. In other words, the appeal manager may not be able to increase the sanction from, for example, a final written warning to a dismissal.
The recent McMillan v Airedale NHS Trust case involved a doctor. The trust initiated disciplinary proceedings against her and issued her with a final written warning. She appealed against this sanction. The appeal panel upheld the complaints against her and proposed to reconvene to reconsider the appropriate sanction. However, Miss McMillan, then concerned that a worse sanction may be imposed (i.e. dismissal) brought proceedings seeking to prevent the trust from changing the sanction. She argued that the trust’s disciplinary procedure did not allow the appeal panel to increase the sanction…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Gateley briefing.
News from Gateley
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Gateley
Commercial litigators have been bombarded over the last year or so with scary cases on costs. The litigation landscape is changing.
In a recent case, the court had to consider the interpretation of contract documents where there are ambiguities in the order of precedence.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Law Society recently published guidance to assist solicitors draw up Shariah-compliant wills, causing outrage in some quarters. Gateley’s Haroon Rashid explains the facts.