Can directors be held personally responsible for litigation costs?
The Court of Appeal has found a director personally liable for the legal costs of an action brought against his company. While the facts are unusual, it highlights a little-used but nonetheless powerful discretion of the court to make costs awards against non-parties to an action when it deems it just to do so.
Mr Threlfall had brought a largely successful High Court claim against his former employer, ECD, and ECD’s director and main shareholder, Mr Whitney. The claim was for breach of contract for failing to pay dividends and honour an agreement to share the equity in ECD. Mr Threlfall also asked the judge to find Mr Whitney jointly and severally liable for the costs of the action arguing by analogy that in the circumstances this was the kind of case in which a non-party costs order would have been made under the Senior Courts Act 1981 had Mr Whitney not been a party to the action. In the event, the judge decided the substantive claim against ECD, and concluded that there was no basis for a claim making Mr Whitney personally liable particularly as ECD was a solvent company. Further, ECD had accepted costs liability and the judge found no reason to make a costs order against Mr Whitney.
Unfortunately, ECD became insolvent after the judgment. Unable to recover his costs from ECD, Mr Threlfall appealed the judge’s decision not to hold Mr Whitney jointly and severally responsible for the litigation costs…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Various amendments have been made to the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
A powerful collaboration of local authorities came together to launch APSE Energy on 11 June 2014 in Parliament.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents