Can covert recordings be relied on in employment tribunal proceedings?
By Nick Pritchett
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has recently held that secret recordings of private deliberations made in the course of grievance and disciplinary proceedings can be used as evidence in a tribunal. We consider what this means for employers.
Rule 41 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 states that tribunals are not bound by any rule of law relating to what can be used in evidence. This gives judges a wide discretion in terms of what to allow, although case law recommends that they balance the need for claims to be tried on all available and relevant evidence with the fact that the discussions of those put in a position of adjudication should be protected.
Tribunals examining this issue have considered it ‘somewhat distasteful when a party seeks to introduce in legal proceedings evidence obtained otherwise than openly or fairly’. There is a recognition that private deliberations can be an essential part of reaching a fair decision by allowing members of a panel to ‘stress test’ employees’ arguments, for example by playing devil’s advocate…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
Two recent cases illustrate the importance of employers making reasonable adjustments for disabled employees placed at risk of redundancy.
The FAPL has issued a warning to people posting unofficial videos of goals online, stating that these videos are in ‘breach of copyright’.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…