Can an act of indirect discrimination be ‘cured’ by an internal appeal?
The nature and details of internal appeals are normally considered in the context of unfair dismissal claims. Internal procedures followed by the employer can be of critical importance. An improper appeal process can taint an otherwise fair dismissal. Conversely, a properly conducted appeal (particularly by way of re-hearing) may render an otherwise unfair dismissal fair.
However, the nature and detail of appeal processes rarely seem to arise in relation to discrimination cases.
They have now. In Little v Richmond Pharmacology Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) was asked to consider whether a successful internal appeal could ‘cure’ an initial decision to refuse an employee’s flexible working application that was indirectly discriminatory because of sex. It decided that it could. This case is notable because it appears to be the first that considers the effect of internal appeals on indirect sex discrimination claims…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
The EAT considered whether an employee who said she was too ill to resign for 18 months and who received 39 weeks’ sick pay during that period had affirmed her contract.
It is possible for employers to defend unfair dismissal claims arising from inappropriate use of social media even if the misconduct is not work-related.