California’s privacy statute regulates companies, but not against out-of-state plaintiffs: a recent decision, two takeaways
By Perrie Michael Weiner, Anahit Tagvoryan and Esteban Morales
Throughout 2013 and into the new year, the plaintiffs’ bar has continued to file a steady stream of privacy-related class action claims. With statutes such as California’s Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act providing for fixed statutory damages, the potential exposure for companies that are sued for making telephone calls in violation of the law can be staggering.
In suits featuring California state law claims and out-of-state plaintiffs, a worthwhile strategy to explore is whether it is possible to limit, or, as we succeeded doing in our client’s case, even eliminate liability by invoking more favourable out-of-state law.
A recent Central District Court decision — Jonczyk v First National Capital Corp — illustrates how an early choice-of-law evaluation in a call-recording case can curb a class action suit at the pleading stage. Although the decision came in the context of CIPA, in appropriate cases the court’s reasoning may extend outside the scope of CIPA and curtail other California privacy or consumer class actions under California law…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Taxation Office released a draft ruling on the Goods and Services Tax treatment of bitcoin transactions on 20 August 2014.
DLA Piper’s ‘Life sciences: patent extension strategies and antitrust global update’ video covers global antitrust and competition issues including product hopping and reverse payment patents.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Cross-border work and political tensions are dominating this year’s entries for Finance Team of the Year at The Lawyer Awards.
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work