California internet privacy bill signed by governor, effective 1 January 2014
By Deborah S Thoren-Peden and Catherine D Meyer, Amy L Pierce, and Elsa S Broeker
On 27 September 2013, California governor Edmund G Brown signed Assembly Bill 370, a bill that amends the Business & Professions Code § 22575 to require an operator of a commercial internet website or online service that collects personally identifiable information about consumers residing in California who use or visit its website or service to disclose how it responds to ‘do-not-track’ signals or other mechanisms that provide consumers with a choice regarding the collection of personally identifiable information (PII) about the consumer’s online activities and to disclose whether others may collect PII when a consumer uses the operator’s website of online service.
California attorney-general Kamala Harris has taken steps over the past two years to enforce Section 22575. This has included reaching agreements with platforms offering mobile apps to require compliant privacy policies for the mobile apps they offer to consumers on their platforms. With the heightened attention being given this statute, it should be expected that the new do-not-track disclosures will be enforced with similar vigour…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Pillsbury briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
Aurora Energy decision deems discharges prohibited, leaves open question of permit shield applicability
On 3 September 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Alaska Community Action on Toxics v Aurora Energy Services LLC.
Scaling back considerably from the October 2012 term, the US Supreme Court issued only a few rulings affecting environmental law during the October 2013 term.