BVI companies for initial public offerings
The British Virgin Islands (BVI) is home to more than 480,000 active business companies. This article considers the benefits of using a BVI company for an initial public offering (IPO).
The benefit is the flexibility of our company law — the BVI Business Companies Act 2004 (BC Act), which came into full force and effect on 1 January 2007. The BC Act is modelled on the Delaware statute but has been anglicised to take account of the fact that the BVI is a common law jurisdiction.
The capital structure of a business company is simple. The BC Act did away with the legal concept of share capital and premium and therefore the requirement for par-value shares. A business company is authorised to issue either a specific number of shares or an unlimited number of shares. A company that issues no par-value shares has the freedom to set the subscription price for its shares, which can provide an advantage in an IPO context when it comes to the offering and marketing of the shares…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Conyers Dill & Pearman briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Conyers Dill & Pearman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Conyers Dill & Pearman
The Supreme Court has now “clarified”, in reality re-formulated, the applicable test for determining whether a particular contractual provision should be struck down as being a penalty.
An appeal to claw back redemption payments has been opposed.