Breathing space for landlords: reclaiming service charges from residential long leaseholders
Where landlords of long residential leases carry out ‘qualifying works’ or enter ‘long-term agreements’, statute imposes requirements on them that substantially restrict their ability to recover service charge from their tenants unless certain consultation requirements are complied with or dispensed with by the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT).
In Daejan the landlord was required to consult with five tenants of a block of flats before carrying out proposed works (valued at £280,000), but failed to fully comply with the consultation requirements. It was a term of the lease that the cost of the work was recoverable as service charge from the tenants.
Daejan asked the LVT for a dispensation, so that it would be able to recover the full amount of £280,000 from the five tenants rather than £250 from each of them which it would otherwise be able to recover. The LVT initially regarded Daejan’s failure as a serious breach of the consultation requirements, which amounted to serious prejudice to the tenants. Accordingly, the LVT refused dispensation and, on appeal, the Upper Tribunal and the Court of Appeal agreed with this refusal…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why