Breach of trust — all or nothing?
The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in AIB v Mark Redler & Co. The case dealt with two main issues: when does a solicitor have authority to release the advance in a remortgage transaction?; and if the solicitor does act in breach of trust, what is the correct remedy?
AIB lent £3.3 million to the borrowers by way of remortgage. In error, Mark Redler & Co, a firm of solicitors, acting for the borrowers and AIB, paid only £1.2 million to Barclays to redeem its charge, leaving £273,000 outstanding (the balance went to the borrowers). Barclays refused to release its charge so the claimant, AIB, did not get the first charge over the property it had expected. The borrowers defaulted and the property was sold, realising £1.2 million, leaving AIB, as second chargeholder, out of pocket by around £3 million. AIB sued the solicitors, not just for the sum paid to the borrowers by mistake, but for the whole of its advance, alleging that the solicitors had acted in breach of trust…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Intellectual property disputes involving retailers and fashion are all too common; another one to have troubled the courts in recent months is Thomas Pink v Victoria’s Secret UK.
In Biscuits Poult SAS v OHIM, the applicant for invalidity challenged the registration on the basis that the design in question was not new and lacked individual character.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.