Bitcoin is property, not currency, IRS says — notice leaves many open questions about convertible virtual currencies

By Joseph H Langhirt, David Plewa and Michael Greenberg

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has joined several other jurisdictions in publishing guidance regarding the income tax consequences of certain convertible virtual currency transactions. IRS Notice 2014-21 clarifies that existing general tax principles apply to transactions using convertible virtual currency and that such virtual currencies should be treated as ‘property’, rather than ‘currency’, for US federal income tax purposes. Classification as property may affect the timing and character of income, gain or loss. While the immediate implications of the notice are apparent, the mid-term and long-term consequences are still being considered. The IRS has indicated that penalties may apply to taxpayers that have taken return positions that are inconsistent with its position in the notice or that have failed to file the appropriate information returns.

Virtual currency, such as Bitcoin, that is ‘convertible’ (i.e. has an equivalent value in or acts as a substitute for ‘real currency’) and that is sold or exchanged or used to pay for goods or services in certain transactions has tax consequences that may result in a tax liability to the person disposing of such virtual currency and/or receiving such virtual currency.

In addition, such tax consequences may be immediate or deferred, and any tax imposed may be at varying rates, depending on the nature of the transaction and the type of person disposing of or receiving such virtual currency…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.

Briefings from DLA Piper

View more briefings from DLA Piper

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


3 Noble Street

Turnover (£m): 1,539.00
No. of lawyers: 4,374(UK 200)
Jurisdiction: Global
No. of offices: Over 75
No. of qualified lawyers: 625 (International 50)