Beyond Excalibur: a valid alternative
By Nick Rowles-Davies
In the legal world, few subjects divide opinion as much as litigation funding. Developments of late have furthered this, with the collapse of Excalibur the most high-profile event to occur in the sector in recent years. Many column inches have been written about the case and funders are used to unwarranted criticism.
All the hard knocks that went with the Excalibur case were expected, but also, perhaps strangely, welcomed — no recognised UK litigation funder was seduced by the false offerings of that case. There is no crowing in this, but it underlines the fact that third-party funding is very much in a period of building on the strong foundations it has established.
Third-party funding has had to stand up and be counted, and it has done this resolutely. However, Excalibur — and the wider implications of the spectacular collapse of that case — has led to a view that the funding industry as a whole is in disarray…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Vannin Capital briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.