Between a rock and a hard place — being neither an employee nor a worker
It will sometimes be the case, as the Employment Appeal Tribunal has recently found in Halawi v WDFG UK Ltd t/a World Duty Free, that an individual will be neither an employee nor a worker and thereby without any protection against unfair dismissal or discrimination.
UK employment legislation (perhaps unhelpfully) sets down several different definitions of employee and worker, depending on which rights are in question. In this case, Ms Halawi attempted to argue employment/worker status under four different provisions.
Unfortunately for her, the Employment Tribunal found at first instance that she did not fall within any of those categories. Ms Halawi appealed against only one of the tribunal’s findings, namely that she was not an employee within the meaning of section 83 of the Equality Act 2010…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
The EAT considered whether an employee who said she was too ill to resign for 18 months and who received 39 weeks’ sick pay during that period had affirmed her contract.
It is possible for employers to defend unfair dismissal claims arising from inappropriate use of social media even if the misconduct is not work-related.