Be careful what you wish for — TUPE applied despite client wanting outsourcing to be short term
A number of carers were employed by Allied to look after a vulnerable adult (X). Allied was contracted by the local council to provide the care. In 2012, Allied decided it was no longer willing to continue and the council applied to the Court of Protection to change the care arrangements. It was initially thought that this would take a few weeks, but several months later the case had still not been decided. Meanwhile, another provider, Prestige, was contracted to take over caring responsibilities. Prestige did not take on the carers and they brought unfair dismissal claims.
At this point, two issues arose: (1) whether the change of provider from Allied to Prestige fell within the exemption from the TUPE service provision change rules for the situation where the client intends that the activities will be carried out ‘in connection with a single specific event or a task of short-term duration’ — the argument was that the client, the council, intended that the activities (X’s care) would, following the service provision change, be carried out by the transferee, Prestige, in connection with a ‘task of short-term duration’; and (2) whether one of the claimants, who had been suspended, was one of those who would be TUPE transferred — the question was whether she was assigned to the ‘organised grouping of workers’ who were subject to the transfer…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump