By Charlotte Stetzel
If a drilling contractor is non-resident in the UK, it is only subject to tax on profits or gains from ‘exploration or exploration activities’ that are defined as ‘activities carried on in connection with the exploration or exploitation of so much of the seabed and subsoil and their natural resources as is situated in the UK or a designated area’.
Most mobile rigs working on the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) are bareboat chartered into the operating company from an overseas owner within the worldwide group resident in a low-tax jurisdiction. Traditionally, HMRC has accepted that where a rig is bareboat chartered the owner is not carrying on ‘exploration or exploration activities’ in the UK or the Continental Shelf and, therefore, the associated rental costs may be claimed as a deduction against the UK profits of that contractor.
This all changed on 5 December 2013, when the chancellor of the exchequer, George Osborne, stated that the government would ‘end the abuse of… offshore oil and gas contracting’…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The Court of Appeal has confirmed the meaning of the expression “in-transit loss” in a voyage charter party in the Trafigura Beheer case.
A recent Commercial Court decision considered the position when a contract provides for the law of one jurisdiction to be applicable, but for the arbitration to take place outside that jurisdiction.