Bar action — barristers and solicitors voice concern over defence fee proposals
By Michelle Heeley
On 7 March, many members of the criminal bar did not attend court. This was not a decision taken lightly, but one designed to highlight the concern that barristers and solicitors have about the proposed new defence fees.
The government, after months of consultation, has announced cuts to fees in the region of 17.5 per cent for solicitors and, on average, six per cent for barristers. One cannot view these figures as standalone cuts though; they must be taken in context with the fact that since 2007 there has been no increase in fees. This means in real terms fees have decreased by more than 20 per cent — and that’s before the imposition of these further cuts.
Most solicitors firms operate on a profit margin of five to six per cent — these cuts mean that redundancies are inevitable, fewer solicitors will have to try and deal with more cases, salaries will be reduced and experienced practitioners will look elsewhere for work leading to inexperienced solicitors dealing with ever-more complicated cases…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
The question of whether two parties have entered in to a binding settlement compromising a case is often just as (if not more) acrimonious matter as the substantive case.
Gypsies and travellers have played a major role in human rights litigation both in the European Court of Human Rights and in UK courts