Bank business transfers — new scheme to transfer all the business
In the recent judgment in In the Matter of the Representation of Standard Chartered (Jersey) Ltd  JRC 172, . The court found that in appropriate cases it has jurisdiction to sanction a transfer of investment business.
The banking law was amended in 2008 to allow for transfers of deposit-taking business between entities by way of a court-sanctioned scheme. Before this change, transfers were effected by private law. The old process was time consuming and costly. The first transfer under the banking law, from Bank of Scotland, Jersey Branch to Lloyds TSB, did not take place until 2011. While the Standard Chartered application is only the second since the law was amended, it is likely that regulatory reforms and in particular the requirements of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill for the UK banks to be ring-fenced will make bank reorganisations involving Jersey branches and entities more common…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ogier briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ogier
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ogier
Decisions over the past 12 months will provide considerable comfort to those concerned about exposure to clawback action.
The High Court of England and Wales may refuse to exercise its discretion to wind up companies incorporated abroad where there would be little likelihood of the petitioners deriving benefit from the winding-up.