Back to zero: government consults on zero-hours employment contracts
Following an information gathering period that took place in late 2013, the government has launched a formal consultation on the use of zero-hours contracts. The consultation paper accepts that the flexibility offered by zero-hours contracts can be valuable for both employers and workers, but is seeking views on the use of exclusivity clauses and asks whether there is sufficient transparency surrounding the implications of being engaged in a fixed-term contract.
Exclusivity clauses prevent a worker undertaking work for anyone else, even if no work is offered under the zero-hours contract. The government accepts that such a clause might be justified in some circumstances — to protect confidential information, for example.
However, there is a concern that such clauses are being used where there is no real justification for them. The consultation paper asks for views on how such misuse could be addressed, including the possibility of a ban on exclusivity clauses in certain contracts…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump