Aviation Law Watch — English Court clamps down on extraordinary circumstances in passenger claims
The Court of Appeal of England and Wales has recently handed down its judgment in the ongoing litigation between Ronald Huzar and Jet2. In its judgment, the Court of Appeal has held that technical defects arising out of the operation of aircraft cannot be relied upon by airlines as constituting extraordinary circumstances for the purpose of defending EC 261 claims, even if those technical defects could not have been foreseen.
The impact of this latest in a long line of consumer-friendly judgments on EC 261 will be to make it that much harder for airlines to defend claims for compensation arising out of cancelled and delayed flights, even where cancellations and delays have been caused by unexpected flight safety shortcomings. Many commentators have expressed concern that this judgment will open the floodgates for passengers to claim compensation going back years, with some saying that this could cost the industry up to £4bn. Consumer claims organisations, such as EU Claims, are already pushing their services in the press and social media.
Mr Huzar and his family were booked to travel on flight LS0810 from Malaga to Manchester, departing 18:25 and arriving 20:25 on 26 October 2011. The aircraft experienced an unexpected technical problem during its inbound flight to Malaga. The left engine fuel advisory light indicated a possible defect in the fuel shut-off valve…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe