Austria: recent Supreme Court ruling leaves many questions re ‘hidden contributions in kind’ open
In a recent decision, the Austrian Supreme Court considered the validity of the payment of a cash consideration to a public limited liability company in the course of an increase of its stated capital (decision dated 25 March 2014, file no. 9 Ob 68/13k). As a consequence of the current Austrian jurisprudence on this matter, any and all business transactions that occur in a substantive and temporal connection with a formal increase of the stated capital — including debt equity swaps — must be made under the disclosure and examination rules for contributions in kind.
In 1999, two Italian individuals subscribed to the cash capital increase of an Austrian public limited liability company, paying a cash consideration of approximately €12m (£10m). The company forwarded this amount to its subsidiary in Italy, which in turn bought assets from the two Italian individuals for a consideration of approximately €40m, partly using the money from the capital increase to do so. Four years later, in the course of a dispute with these shareholders, the company ‘discovered’ that it might still have an open claim against these shareholders because the disclosure and examination rules on contributions in kind had not been met and declared that it was offsetting its claim against a damage claim made by the shareholders.
The Supreme Court held that the shareholders’ payment in 1999 was void and did not fulfil their payment obligation because the disclosure and examination rules for contributions other than cash contributions were not met. In addition, the court indicated that the parallel business transaction — i.e. the sale of assets from the target company’s subsidiary to the shareholders — might be void…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Schoenherr briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Schoenherr
Briefings from Schoenherr
Until recently the Serbian legal system has not paid much attention to protecting whistleblowers. However, it seems the situation is improving.
On 1 January 2014, the Romanian Government introduced a new property tax, namely a tax on constructions. This tax has proven to be controversial.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work